No, you should not treat them as the same hardware, because the README distinguishes capability by chipset and hardware revision, and V1 versus V2/V3 appear under different support entries.

• The Supported Hardware table lists TP-Link TL-WN722N V1 under Atheros AR9271, marked as 2.4 GHz.
• It lists TL-WN722N v2/v3 under Realtek RTL8188EUS, showing that visually similar revisions use different chipsets.
• Project insights explicitly warn that adapters with the same appearance but different hardware revisions may have completely different capabilities; monitor mode, injection, bands, and stability cannot be inferred from the product name alone.
• On Windows, first-time setup also installs WinUSB through UAC, changing the device binding used by normal Wi-Fi.

Therefore, verifying the label, USB enumeration information, and Supported Hardware documentation is a hard prerequisite; the shared TL-WN722N name is not enough.

Yes, provided that your adapter is on the supported list and you accept the fact that wifit3 takes direct control of the USB device.

• The README defines it as a standalone USB Wi-Fi auditor for Linux, Windows, and macOS, with an identical cross-platform workflow as a goal.
• Its Mini-Drivers control devices directly through USB bulk/control transfers, bypassing the native Wi-Fi stack and removing the runtime need for aircrack-ng or reaver.
• Scanning, AP/client identification, WPA/WPA2 handshakes, PMKID, WPS, WEP, and pcap/hc22000 export are integrated in one application.
• The trade-off is system integration: first run may change Linux udev/modprobe settings, while Windows installs WinUSB. The README provides an Uninstall flow to restore the device binding.

It is therefore a good fit for a cross-platform, USB-based auditing workflow, not for ordinary Wi-Fi connectivity.

It depends: the README documents a clear recovery procedure, but it requires running Uninstall before unplugging and carries additional risk because the project directly operates hardware registers.

• First run may write Linux udev permissions and /etc/modprobe.d/ blocklists; Windows installs a WinUSB binding.
• The Uninstall procedure requires selecting the card on the splash screen, clicking Uninstall, accepting elevation, then unplugging and reconnecting the adapter.
• The README says Linux rules are deleted, while Windows removes the WinUSB binding and triggers a PnP rescan so the old driver reattaches.
• Project insights warn that unplugging or returning to normal use without uninstalling may temporarily disable system Wi-Fi; the disclaimer also notes that kernel guardrails are bypassed.

The procedure is operationally clear, but the project documentation does not support a zero-risk or unattended switching guarantee.

Yes, it fits this authorized lab workflow, but the presence of a feature does not mean every AP and client will yield a successful capture.

• The scanner tracks encryption suites and WPA3/SAE transition modes, which supports identifying transition-mode targets.
• WPA/WPA2 support includes passive sniffing, targeted deauthentication, crackable-pair validation, and export to .pcap and .hc22000.
• PMKID support includes both active association harvesting and passive sniffing, with .hc22000 output.
• The EvilTwin WPA3 Downgrade flow evicts clients through CSA, BTM, and deauthentication to capture handshakes, and the README says it works with single and multiple cards.

The feature set and output formats match your requirement. However, project insights say success depends on AP configuration, client behavior, signal quality, and vendor implementation; active flows may also interrupt service or trigger detection.

Yes, particularly if you are willing to review USB driver ports and firmware licensing rather than treating it as an ordinary Python CLI.

• The project is primarily Python with a small amount of Shell, and the README identifies PyUSB and Textual as its main runtime libraries.
• The source path uses Astral’s uv, with documented commands for dependency synchronization, execution, and PyInstaller packaging; the output is placed in dist/.
• Mini-Drivers live under src/wifit3/chips/* and operate through USB bulk/control transfers. This improves inspectability but means defects can affect device state.
• The code is GPLv2, while firmware blobs are redistributed under vendor licenses. A release process requiring license-by-license verification must review both areas.

It fits maintainers comfortable with Python, uv, and USB debugging; the README does not establish the maturity expected of a broadly validated commercial binary.

It depends: the software explicitly supports multi-card aggregation, but results depend on chipset, band support, and USB/RF conditions.

• The Features section provides Multi-Card Aggregation, allowing simultaneous capture across adapters and selection of a dedicated injection card.
• The Real-time Scanner supports 2.4GHz and 5GHz channel hopping and splits channels across multiple cards.
• The support table includes 2.4GHz-only devices such as Atheros AR9271 and Realtek RTL8187L, alongside dual-band MT7610U, MT7612U, MT7921AU, and several Realtek chipsets. Mixed adapters therefore do not have identical capabilities.
• Project insights identify USB bandwidth, power, antenna placement, channel planning, and device conflicts as factors affecting collection; adding adapters does not inherently improve results.

The architecture matches your requirement, but each adapter must be checked against the Supported Hardware limitations rather than planned by device count alone.