Drawnix: Open-source all-in-one whiteboard with mindmap and plugin support
Drawnix is an open-source, Plait-based all-in-one whiteboard offering mind maps, flowcharts and freehand drawing with a plugin-driven architecture for extensibility; suitable for self-hosting teams and developers for quick integration and customization. However, limited contributors and no official releases warrant extra evaluation for production and long-term maintenance.
GitHub plait-board/drawnix Updated 2025-08-28 Branch develop Stars 10.5K Forks 774
TypeScript Frontend Whiteboard Plugin Architecture Self-hosting / Team Collaboration

💡 Deep Analysis

4
What concrete whiteboard problems does Drawnix solve? What are its advantages compared to separate mindmap/flow/hand-draw tools?

Core Analysis

Project Positioning: Drawnix addresses the problem of fragmented expression tools and closed SaaS lock-in — users want mind maps, flowcharts and freehand drawing in one self-hostable, embeddable product. Drawnix solves this by delivering an all-in-one open-source whiteboard.

Technical Features

  • Integrated feature set: Built-in mindmap, flowchart, pen drawing, image insertion and support for mermaid and markdown->mindmap conversions, lowering the friction from text to diagrams.
  • Plait-based drawing engine: Abstracts drawing, node relations, and stroke logic, reducing reimplementation cost and easing reuse across products.
  • Plugin + monorepo architecture: Packages like react-board and react-text are separated for on-demand reuse and secondary development.
  • Local-first features: Browser auto-save, PNG/JSON export, making it suitable for offline/low-latency scenarios.

Practical Recommendations

  1. When replacing fragmented tools: Migrate frequent diagram types (mindmaps, flows) into Drawnix and leverage markdown/mermaid conversion in your content pipeline.
  2. For quick embedding: Reuse react-board for React apps; use the provided Docker image as a self-hosting starting point.

Caveats

  • Browser auto-save is not equivalent to cross-device sync or enterprise backups; you should implement backend persistence for production.
  • While the architecture claims multi-framework support, adapting to non-React environments requires engineering effort.

Important Notice: Drawnix is best used as an embeddable, self-hosted whiteboard capability—not a turnkey enterprise multi-user collaboration system.

Summary: Drawnix offers a practical, extensible open-source solution to unify multiple diagram types and embed diagram editing into products, but you will need to add backend sync and collaboration features for enterprise use.

88.0%
For teams wanting multi-user collaboration, what are Drawnix's limitations in persistence and real-time collaboration? How to quickly strengthen it to meet enterprise needs?

Core Analysis

Core Question: Drawnix is front-end first with browser auto-save; it lacks out-of-the-box multi-user real-time collaboration and enterprise persistence/permission features. How to quickly strengthen it to meet team collaboration needs?

Technical Analysis

  • Current limitation: README only mentions browser auto-save and JSON export; no built-in CRDT/OT or multi-user sync, so it does not support native cross-device concurrent editing or automatic merge.
  • Strengthening approaches:
  • Integrate CRDT (e.g., yjs): map canvas state or core model to a CRDT document and use y-websocket for real-time sync and conflict resolution.
  • Implement OT or custom locking/merge: higher complexity, not recommended for short-term.
  • Backend persistence: periodically persist CRDT snapshots or .drawnix JSON to DB/object storage for versioning/restore.
  • Permissions & audit: add authentication (OAuth/JWT) and event logging for access control and compliance.

Practical Steps (short-term)

  1. Prototype: add yjs and build a state->CRDT adapter that maps the core graph model to a collaborative doc.
  2. Sync service: deploy y-websocket or a WebSocket gateway as the collaboration endpoint.
  3. Persistence: snapshot CRDT docs or save .drawnix files to backend storage at checkpoints.
  4. Permissions: implement basic auth (JWT) at the service layer, then extend to fine-grained ACLs.

Caveats

  • State mapping is non-trivial: mapping Plait internal structures to CRDT needs careful design around IDs, operation idempotency, and performance.
  • Performance: syncing many objects requires compression, throttling, and sharding strategies.

Important Notice: Use a mature CRDT like yjs plus snapshot persistence—avoid reimplementing OT in-house for short-term delivery.

Summary: By integrating CRDT + backend snapshotting and basic auth, you can reach a practical multi-user collaboration capability for Drawnix, but you must design a robust adapter between Plait models and the CRDT representation.

86.0%
How do Drawnix's export/import capabilities (PNG, .drawnix JSON, markdown/mermaid->diagrams) support interoperability with knowledge bases or document systems? What should be noted?

Core Analysis

Core Question: How do Drawnix export/import features support interoperability with knowledge bases and document systems, balancing visual embedding vs. editable restoration?

Technical Analysis

  • PNG export (static display): Good for embedding diagrams in docs and KBs—widely compatible but loses structure and editability.
  • .drawnix JSON (editable backup): Preserves the full model for cross-device editing, restores and two-way sync. Requires schema/version management and compatibility checks.
  • markdown/mermaid -> diagrams (auto-generate): Efficiently turns text into structured diagrams. Conversion rules (indentation->hierarchy, style defaults) must be standardized to avoid semantic loss during later edits.

Practical Recommendations

  1. Display use: Use PNGs for previews and print-friendly assets in knowledge bases.
  2. Editable use: Store and sync .drawnix JSON on backend with versioning and import APIs for editability.
  3. Pipeline integration: Integrate markdown/mermaid conversion into CI or editor plugins to automatically produce .drawnix or seed the board for editing.

Caveats

  • Maintain .drawnix versioning and migration scripts to avoid breakage as the model evolves.
  • Document conversion rules (markdown->mindmap) and edge cases to reduce fidelity loss.
  • Don’t rely solely on browser cache—implement backend backups for important content.

Important Notice: PNGs are for display; only .drawnix preserves editability. Combining both with robust version control ensures long-term, reliable integration.

Summary: Use PNG for low-cost display, .drawnix for editable interoperability, and bake markdown/mermaid conversion into your content pipeline—while enforcing versioning and conversion rules to avoid data loss.

85.0%
Is embedding Drawnix into non-React apps (e.g., Angular or plain JS SPA) feasible? What steps and risks are involved?

Core Analysis

Core Question: Can Drawnix be embedded into non-React environments, and what are the steps and risks?

Technical Analysis

  • Current state: react-board and react-text indicate React is the primary view layer; README claims multi-framework support but lacks examples.
  • Feasible approaches:
    1. Web Component wrapping: Convert React components to custom elements (react-to-webcomponent, Stencil). Pros: easy embed; cons: styling and event bridging require care.
    2. iframe / micro-frontends: Host Drawnix as an isolated subapp and communicate via postMessage. Pros: strong isolation; cons: cross-document comms and latency.
    3. Reimplement view layer: Build an Angular/Vue adapter based on Plait. Pros: native UX; cons: large engineering effort.

Practical Steps (short-term)

  1. Try Web Component wrapping of React components to validate interactions and styling boundaries.
  2. If isolation is important, use iframe and design a controlled API (save/export/events) via postMessage.
  3. Define IPC message formats, auth, and throttling.

Caveats

  • CSS conflicts: use Shadow DOM or strict namespacing.
  • Performance & load: Web Components still load React runtime; iframe can lazy-load.
  • Interaction parity: keyboard, focus, and drag behaviors need special handling across frameworks.

Important Notice: For short-term integration, prefer Web Component or iframe to reduce cost; only consider rewriting the view layer for deep, long-term integration.

Summary: Embedding Drawnix into non-React apps is feasible with multiple paths; Web Component or iframe approaches are recommended as initial, lower-risk options.

84.0%

✨ Highlights

  • Open-source, free and covers multiple whiteboard scenarios
  • Plugin-based design enables extensible UI and features
  • Supports export to PNG and JSON (.drawnix) formats
  • Limited number of contributors; long-term maintenance is uncertain
  • No official releases in repo; production deployment requires caution

🔧 Engineering

  • All-in-one whiteboard integrating mind maps, flowcharts, freehand drawing, and image insertion
  • Built on Plait framework and Slate, implemented in TypeScript for modern, typed code
  • Supports infinite canvas, undo/redo, copy/paste, mermaid and markdown-to-diagram features
  • Provides browser auto-save and a Docker image, facilitating local or self-hosted deployment trials

⚠️ Risks

  • Only 8 active contributors and no official releases; community support and maintenance capacity is limited
  • Auto-save relies on browser cache and does not equate to persistent backend storage by default
  • No releases or clear compatibility matrix; enterprise integration and long-term operations require additional validation

👥 For who?

  • Product, design, and collaborative teams that need an interactive whiteboard with extensibility
  • Open-source enthusiasts and developers suitable for customization, extension, and internal integrations
  • Education and rapid prototyping scenarios where low-cost trials and local deployment are useful